Universidad de SalamancaDepartamento de Lengua Española (área de Lingüística General)

Emma Machado de Souza

Read in English

Emma Machado de Souza

ORCID Google Scholar ResearchGate OSF Correo

Metodologías queer: repensando métodos y prácticas en la investigación social

Curso del IUCE para la formación continua del personal docente e investigador de la universidad. Tres sesiones de discusión abierta en torno a cuatro ejes: categorización, posicionalidad, ética e interseccionalidad.

Sesión 1. Fundamentos epistemológicos

Diapositivas PDF, 48 páginas

Bibliografía recomendada

Bibliografía para ampliar

  • Adams, T. E., & Holman Jones, S. (2011). Telling stories: Reflexivity, queer theory, and autoethnography. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 11(2), 108-116. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532708611401329
  • Borba, R., & Ostermann, A. C. (2007). Do bodies matter? Gender and Language, 1(1), 131-147. https://doi.org/10.1558/genl.2007.1.1.131
  • Crawley, S. L., Whitlock, M., & Earles, J. (2021). Smithing queer empiricism: Engaging ethnomethodology for a queer social science. Sociological Theory, 39(3), 127-152. https://doi.org/10.1177/07352751211026357
  • Cull, M. J. (2024). Trans epistemology and methodological radicalism: Un Œuf, but enough. Hypatia, 39(1), 44-60. https://doi.org/10.1017/hyp.2023.102
  • Dahl, U. (2016). Femme on femme. En K. Browne & C. J. Nash (Eds.), Queer methods and methodologies: Intersecting queer theories and social science research (pp. 143-166). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315603223-10
  • Cuklanz, L., & Erol, A. (2020). Queer theory and feminist methods: A review. Investigaciones Feministas, 11(2), 211-220. https://doi.org/10.5209/infe.66476
  • McDonald, J. (2013). Coming out in the field: A queer reflexive account of shifting researcher identity. Management Learning, 44(2), 127-143. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507612473711
  • Motschenbacher, H. (2011). Taking Queer Linguistics further: sociolinguistics and critical heteronormativity research. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 2011(212). https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl.2011.050
  • Motschenbacher, H., & Stegu, M. (2013). Queer Linguistic approaches to discourse. Discourse & Society, 24(5), 519-535. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926513486069
  • O'Malley, M. P., Asher, N., Beck, B. L., Capper, C. A., Lugg, C. A., Murphy, J. P., & Whitlock, R. U. (2018). Asking queer(er) questions: Epistemological and methodological implications for qualitative inquirers. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 31(7), 572-594. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2018.1455996
  • Wang, S., Wang, N. C., & Lee, W. C. (2026). Methodological and ethical considerations in lGBTQ-Focused online ethnographic research: A systematic review and a human-Centered framework. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 25. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069251411167

Vídeo

Audio

Datos

Lectura

Sesión 2. Métodos y prácticas

Diapositivas PDF, 45 páginas

Bibliografía recomendada

  • Brown, L. (2021). A philosophy, a methodology, and a gender identity: Bringing pragmatism and mixed methods research to transformative nonbinary focused sociophonetic research. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics, 43(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.33137/twpl.v43i1.35965
  • Browne, K. (2016). Queer quantification or queer(y)ing quantification. En K. Browne & C. J. Nash (Eds.), Queer methods and methodologies: Intersecting queer theories and social science research (pp. 231-250). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315603223-15
  • Calder, J. (2021). Whose indexical field is it? The role of community epistemology in indexing social meaning. En Proceedings of the 20th meeting of the Texas Linguistic Society. Texas Linguistic Society.
  • Jackman, M. C. (2016). The trouble with fieldwork. En K. Browne & C. J. Nash (Eds.), Queer methods and methodologies: Intersecting queer theories and social science research (pp. 113-128). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315603223-8
  • Dadas, C. (2016). Messy methods: Queer methodological approaches to researching social media. Computers and Composition, 40, 60-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2016.03.007
  • Levy, D. L., & Johnson, C. W. (2011). What does the Q mean? Including queer voices in qualitative research. Qualitative Social Work, 11(2), 130-140. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325011400485
  • Motschenbacher, H. (2018). Corpus linguistics in language and sexuality studies. Journal of Language and Sexuality, 7(2), 145-174. https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.17019.mot
  • Gorman-Murray, A., Johnston, L., & Waitt, G. (2016). Queer(ing) communication in research relationships. En K. Browne & C. J. Nash (Eds.), Queer methods and methodologies: Intersecting queer theories and social science research (pp. 97-112). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315603223-7
  • Rooke, A. (2009). Queer in the field: On emotions, temporality, and performativity in ethnography. Journal of Lesbian Studies, 13(2), 149-160. https://doi.org/10.1080/10894160802695338

Bibliografía para ampliar

  • Fish, J. N., & Russell, S. T. (2018). Queering methodologies to understand queer families. Family Relations, 67(1), 12-25. https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12297
  • Franzke, A. S., Bechmann, A., Zimmer, M., & Ess, C. (2020). Internet research: Ethical guidelines 3.0. Association of Internet Researchers. https://aoir.org/reports/ethics3.pdf
  • Graham, M. (2016). Method matters. En K. Browne & C. J. Nash (Eds.), Queer methods and methodologies: Intersecting queer theories and social science research (pp. 183-194). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315603223-12
  • Muñoz, L. (2016). Brown, queer and gendered. En K. Browne & C. J. Nash (Eds.), Queer methods and methodologies: Intersecting queer theories and social science research (pp. 55-68). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315603223-4
  • Nye, C. M., Livingston, J. A., & Hequembourg, A. (2023). Key considerations for conducting qualitative research with LGBTQ + youth. International Journal of LGBTQ+ Youth Studies, 22(1), 1-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/19361653.2023.2253444
  • Smuts (2024). Exploring the Pleasures and Perils of Participant Observation in Researching Heterosexual Identities
  • Vriesendorp, H., & Wilson, R. T. (2024). Minority genders in quantitative survey research: a data-driven approach to clear, inclusive, and accurate gender questions. Linguistics Vanguard, 10(1), 493-504. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2023-0025

Vídeo

Audio

Lectura

Sesión 3. Ética, política e interseccionalidad

Diapositivas PDF, 28 páginas

Bibliografía recomendada

  • Detamore, M. (2016). Queer(y)ing the ethics of research methods. En K. Browne & C. J. Nash (Eds.), Queer methods and methodologies: Intersecting queer theories and social science research (pp. 167-182). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315603223-11
  • Guyan, K. (2022). Fight back! Using queer data. En Queer data: Using gender, sex and sexuality data for action. Bloomsbury. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350230767
  • McDonald, J. (2016). Expanding queer reflexivity: The closet as a guiding metaphor for reflexive practice. Management Learning, 47(4), 391-406. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507615610029
  • Moussawi, G., Richardson, J. W., & Greene, T. (2025). Beyond positionalities: Moving toward a queer embodied approach to researching LGBTQ+ space and placemaking. Sex & Sexualities, 1(2), 201-210. https://doi.org/10.1177/30333717251375993
  • Sibbald, K. R., Phelan, S. K., Beagan, B. L., & Pride, T. M. (2025). Positioning positionality and reflecting on reflexivity: Moving from performance to practice. Qualitative Health Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323241309230
  • Taylor, Y. (2010). Complexities and complications: Intersections of class and sexuality. En Theorizing intersectionality and sexuality (pp. 37-55). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230304093_3
  • Vincent, B. W. (2018). Studying trans: recommendations for ethical recruitment and collaboration with transgender participants in academic research. Psychology & Sexuality, 9(2), 102-116. https://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2018.1434558

Bibliografía para ampliar

  • Bilge, S. (2013). Intersectionality undone: Saving intersectionality from feminist intersectionality studies. Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race, 10(2), 405-424. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1742058x13000283
  • Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of chicago legal forum, 1989(1). https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf/vol1989/iss1/8/
  • Kerekere, E. (2017). Part of the whānau: The emergence of Takatāpui identity. He whāriki takatāpui. Victoria University of Wellington. https://doi.org/10.26686/wgtn.17060225
  • Platero, L. R. (2015). ¿Es el análisis interseccional una metodología feminista y queer? En I. Mendia Azkue, M. Luxán, M. Legarreta, G. Guzmán, I. Zirion, & J. Azpiazu (Eds.), Otras formas de (re)conocer: Reflexiones, herramientas y aplicaciones desde la investigación feminista (pp. 79-96). Hegoa / SIMReF.
  • Radi, B. (2019). Políticas del conocimiento: Hacia una epistemología trans*. En M. López Seoane (Ed.), Los mil pequeños sexos: Intervenciones críticas sobre políticas de género y sexualidades. Eduntref. https://www.aacademica.org/blas.radi/32
  • Radi, B. (2021). Las personas trans en la ontología social oficial: Políticas de números con perspectiva de género. Revista Argentina de Ciencia Política, (26). https://doi.org/10.62174/racp.6658
  • Tuck, E. (2009). Suspending damage: A letter to communities. Harvard Educational Review, 79(3), 409-428. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.79.3.n0016675661t3n15

Vídeo

Lectura

Las diapositivas son de mi autoría y se distribuyen con licencia CC BY-NC-SA 4.0: se pueden reutilizar y adaptar citando la fuente, sin fines comerciales y manteniendo la misma licencia.

Bibliografía del curso, con la referencia de cada lectura.

Toda la docencia